COMBATSIM.COM: The Ultimate Combat Simulation and Strategy Gamers' Resource.
 

 
Quantum Fireball KA Plus
by Leonard "Viking1" Hjalmarson

 

Recently we reviewed the Western Digital Expert ATA 66 drive. With ATA 66 now supported on the new mainboards, purchasing a new hard drive means a choice between one of the new generation of UDMA drives.

With a price difference of around $20 US, is the ATA 66 standard worth the difference? And if you are changing parts or building a new system, is it worth moving to the 7200RPM drives from the older 5400 RPM standard?

I've owned a series of Quantum drives and have always been pleased with the performance. Their new Fireball Plus KA drives all run at 7200RPM and support the Ultra ATA/66 interface. I recently installed an 18 GB Fireball drive and put it through its paces.

Specifications

  • Capacity: 18.2 GB
  • Interface: Ultra ATA/66
  • Seek time: 8.5ms
  • Average 7200RPM rotational latency: 4.17ms
  • Total average seek time: 12.67ms
  • RPM: 7200
  • Internal data rate: 235MB/sec
  • Buffer size: 512k
  • Data Protection System
  • Shock Protection System

The Fireball Plus KA supports ATA-66 and is backwards compatible with older EIDE/ATA interfaces. This means that you can use the drive in an older system and then benefit by the new standard when you upgrade.

Quantum also has a new Data Protection System (DPS). Apparently more than 40 percent of hard drives returned by customers show no failure when tested. As a result, Quantum needed to develop an easy method for PC users to determine whether their hard drive is the source of a system failure. If you're having problems with your system, you can use Quantum's DPS to check your hard disk to make sure it's working properly. Quantum drives also designed a new Shock Protection System although hard drives have been all but indestructible for a few years now.

UDMA 66 and UDMA 33

The "33" and "66" numbers indicate the maximum transfer rate. DMA-33 supports a 33.3MB/s maximum transfer rate and DMA-66 supports a 66.6MB/s maximum transfer rate. Are DMA-66 drives twice as fast as DMA-33 drives? No. But then, the sustained transfer rate of UDMA 33 drives is also much lower than 33MB/s. The real question is a simple one: how much faster than ATA 33 are the ATA 66 drives?

Click to continue

 

V2

ATA-66

Installing the Fireball KA Plus was a cinch. I simply connected the drive to my Fast Trak 66 adapter and then booted WIN98 from a floppy. I formated the hard disk and installed WIN98,then followed the adapter instructions and loaded the new drivers from the floppy disk. Voila!

I was a bit unnerved that WIN98 identified the drive under the "SCSI controllers" section of Device Manager. After installing the new drivers, Windows listed a "HPT 366 Ultra DMA Controller."

Test System and Performance

  • ASUS P2L97 motherboard
  • Celeron 433mhz processor
  • 128mg of SDRAM
  • V3 3000 video card
  • Windows '98, clean install

BusinessDisk

BusinessDisk

As you can see, UDMA-66 does outperform UDMA-33. Quantum's Fireball Plus KA outperforms the older 5400RPM Western Digital drive in the benchmarks. Falcon 4 loaded about 35% faster under this drive than under a Western Digital drive running ATA 33 at 5400 RPM. The ATA 66 WD Expert, like the Fireball, was a 7200 RPM drive but with a whopping 2 MB buffer!

CPU utilization was up just slightly running the Quantum under ATA 66 vs ATA 33, from 1.9% to 2.3%. I've also found the new Fireball a bit more noisy than my old WD drive, but the additional performance is worth it. Besides, when I am running any of my favorite games my sound system is drowning out any peripheral noises.

With processor speeds now exceeding 600 MHz, you need a big pipe to feed data. The new ATA 66 7200 RPM breed of drives are just the ticket. Quantum has released another excellent product; gamers take note!

Join a discussion forum on this article by clicking   HERE.

 

Copyright © 1997 - 2000 COMBATSIM.COM, INC. All Rights Reserved.

Last Updated August 20th, 1999

© 2014 COMBATSIM.COM - All Rights Reserved