|
|
This is our archive forum. It contains posts from 1999 to 2003. If you prefer, you may participate in our current COMBATSIM.COM Forum
|
|
|
|
Author
|
Topic: BEST SIM IN DECADE is USAF....
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MadHatter
unregistered
|
posted 12-14-1999 05:54 PM
Hey...I said I liked the graphics. lol You'd give USAF "sim of the year"?? come on...get real oversensitive joystick control, huge hit bubbles. Three mile gun kills, Phantoms that pull 18g's without falling apart, phantoms out turning F16's... A-10's accelerate like they have afterburners, and can hold turns as if they were running afterburners. If these things were fixed...well then I'd be more inclined to play this sim. But I think I wasted my money. Oh. one more thing I have big problems with in this game is the padlock view. All the flipping forwards and backwards it does. If it would stay in one direction it would be ok. I bought this game, and I was excited about it at first just like most of us were. I still think it's great looking game. But after playing it for a while I just couldn't handle all the little things that were bugging me. So I shelved it. So then you're wondering why am I here?? well I keep hoping that there will be a patch that will allow me to enjoy this game.Oh and by the way I have a family, I have a job...I still found time to learn the ins and outs of Falcon 4, I'm learning the ins and outs of Flanker 2 as well. And I know I'll learn the super hornets too. It's all in your priorities. Take the manuals to work and read them on your coffe breaks, on the bus, or in your car pool. Doesn't take long to apply the knowledge to the game if you have it in your head. I didn't mean to start a flame war or anything likt that. I just question wether games should be "sims of the decade or year" based on graphics alone. Which is what you guys are doing. sorry for pissing anyone off... but it's the truth. MadHatter out....
IP: Logged
|
|
slingshot
unregistered
|
posted 12-14-1999 05:58 PM
I've taken that your a newbie in flight-sim, huh? Start simming this year while the genre has been alive from the 80's and a decade means you gotta start looking from 1990?No intention to flame here but your absolutely entitled your opinion. Cheer for free speech (and please no snickering in the back)  PS: does "sim" excludes other type of simulation other than flight-sim? If yes, hummph..hummph (trying to suppress laughter)
IP: Logged
|
|
Douger
Member
Member # 1239
|
posted 12-14-1999 07:47 PM
Personally,graphics dont mean a whole heck of alot to me,and sure it needs some "random features"worked on but then go to a F4 group and list the bugs there(which I've owned since day one,Flanker 2,which I also enjoy.They all have bug list,but very few "survey" sims are not meant to be extensive to the point where each plane deserves 200 pages each.I do not agree that it should be "sim of the year",I still reserve that for Longbow 2. I know its old but I still think that its still the only one that has come the closest to hitting the mark right out of the box in my opinon. So all I meant was for the feeling of acomplishment there is F15,F4,LB2, But for short term amusment USAF seems to do the job at least for me,luckily I hav'nt had any problems running the game. Lets just keep good feelings here and reserve the bad ones for the bad guys and help each other out.
------------------
Posts: 9 | From: Henderson,NV US | Registered: Dec 1999 | IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kurt Plummer
Member
Member # 358
|
posted 12-16-1999 07:29 PM
If there was going to be a patch...It would have been out by now. Pixel has ducked with the money and run for the hills, hoping that we'll be sufficiently 'ooooh and awwh shucksed' by some flaming worthless piece of TBird Trash that we won't notice how LONG this steaming pile of dogpoop has been stinking up the airwaves without any REAL improvement. I got it (two actually) hated it, waited for it to get better, and now /can't/ wait to hear how much we're going to have to 'pay for a patch' in the addon. 39 bucks isn't chump change for ALL of us you know. How Typical, JF-18 is a lump of coal in my stocking while Pixel has whambammed-and- doorslammed. Did I mention that UME is still a 90% lock-up-solid 'experience' for me? It's a scream. Bend Over America; /USAF/ has been 'done' by the Israelis. KP
Who couldn't jerk his fly down fast enough, has enough internal vinegar to put out most flames, and thinks that an average of six worthless missions 'per war' is about the dumbest thing since Pointers in the Pool to liven up the Olympic synchronized swimming.
Oh wait, that's actually a good one...
Posts: 672 | From: | Registered: Sep 1999 | IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PinchVF-124
Member
Member # 223
|
posted 12-17-1999 07:32 PM
GeekGuy = Your name says it all. LAMO!BigShot = "If they're gonna sell a novalogic game then they damn well better adverstise it that way so us consumers know what we're getting ahead of time" They NEVER advertised it as a "HardCore" sim. If you were to read Janes site you would see. Does the box read ULTRA REALISTIC? NO!! Key Features Fly the hottest 8 jets in the U.S. Air Force More than 62 historical and hypothetical missions including a semi-dynamic future campaign Advanced graphics featuring spectacular special effects, 3D cockpits for each aircraft, and screen resolution up to 1280 x 1024 Mission recording and playback Detailed 'real-world' terrain using stereoscopic satellite data with true elevation and coloring Voice activation for wingman commands, aircraft operations, and pre-defined chat messages JanesCombat.Net compatible - Multiplayer mode supports up to 16 players. "I thought Novalogics sim was a hell of a lot better then USAF" Thats because you have that old TNT card. Novalogics F22 graphics would run better on that card. Upgrade to TNT2 and THEN see what you're missing!! Lame excuse to be mad BigShot. I've read some of your posts , and I think you're a bitter old man that likes to be pissed.. Kurt Plummer = "If there was going to be a patch...It would have been out by now." Im surprised you posted this 3rd grade statement! LMAO For someone that seems to be an intelligent person , you blew on that one. But me thinks its reverse psychology P Lud von Pipper = USAF terrain is WAY better then IAF.
Pinch...
Posts: 61 | From: Anaheim Ca U.S.A. | Registered: Sep 1999 | IP: Logged
|
|
Kurt Plummer
Member
Member # 358
|
posted 12-17-1999 08:17 PM
Hey Lud,I hope you're not pulling my leg, if so, prepare to be bored...:-) I got two copies of USAF for my birthday, one from the gentler half and one early on my own hook because I wasn't sure she'd be getting it and 'couldn't wait'. I took mine back but kept the gift. This got me into trouble later because I had posted a message that said something like 'It goes back'. I swear up and down that I played the game through the first evening (which is in and of itself a baaaad sign) so it didn't matter that I got another copy. I sure as hell couldn't take /that one/ back, to the same store. Still, I dropped the hammer on Pixel for what I felt were some easy technical fixes (weapons, ECM and airspeeds) as well as a general disappointment with the accuracy of the mission modelling that would have needed some rather more substantial changes. Now one of the threads here mentions a possible addon. I imagined this would be the way things would go when Pixel promised (in an interview) editors and stuff 'based on sales' but made no further response. Not only have we not had that but the game itself doesn't 'work' in so many _easy_ areas to fix. Graphically, yeah it's pretty (excepting the F-4 and F-22) if a tad 'watery' at moments. I still get a lot of hits in the frame rates with smoke and multiple aircraft even occasionally dumping me to desktop (especially around the airfield) but I don't mind the terrain tears etc. so much (the landscape still beats the acid trip that was IAF by leaps and /miles/). I think this may be part of my biggest disappointment in that, on at least one side, USAF comes /so close/ to being 'superb'. The User Mission Editor. Not my fault dude. It just doesn't turn on without locking up my machine to the point of reboot. Janes Lump Of Coal. Well we all know it will be a diamond 'some day' but to miss Christmas with JF-18 seems, unusual. A USAF _PATCH_ or even an expansion set for one of their other games would have been a decent enough interval hold but still, Santa Jane 'all I wanted for X-Mas'...(was a Bug and a good ship to fling it from:`) Pointers. Great White Sharks. KP
Posts: 672 | From: | Registered: Sep 1999 | IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Daddio
unregistered
|
posted 12-18-1999 07:51 PM
Wait let me get in on this. I can REALLY heat it up! Which one of you is saying that ANY GAME on a PC is a simulation???Without a REAL cockpit that moves, shuts out the outside world, has real switches and gauges, etc... and a screen that is at least on 3 sides of me, then I wouldn't call it a simulation at all. You need about $200K for a SIM. You want real go buy a ride in a P-51 or T-28. This is just a PC. Of course that's my opinion, I could be wrong! So how big does the manual have to be to make it a sim? What amount of missle tracking accuracy, or deviation of slipstream vs. rudder movement? Hell I dunno!!! I just know that I like it or don't! I actually enjoy all flight programs (some better than others) and I buy most of them. I've got Falcon4, F2, USAF and IAF (although I did delete IAF!). So everybody stop debating for a minute and check my post about MFD buttons. I want to program keys for them for my cockpit! Yes I have a TM cockpit with lights and switches, etc... Here's a story. When I was a kid (a looong time ago, I'm 44) I got this thing for XMAS called a Jimmy Jet. It was a little plastic cockpit with little knobs and a round plastic scenery drum that rotated around a light bulb. Had little crosshairs on the buildings in the scene and when one came by I'd press my little button and swooosh! shoot a plastic missle right over the dogs head! Now THAT was fun. My dad first saw my TM cockpit and said "damn kid got a new Jimmy Jet!" That ought to about sum it up... My kids favorite thing to do in the cockpit? Star Wars Pod Racer. Hey, it's fun. Have fun with it guys, that's why we are here! Check Six, Daddio P.S. Geekboy, what's up with the "Me big you little fish bait" broken English? Keep it up it makes me laugh...8-)
IP: Logged
|
|
Lud von Pipper
Member
Member # 82
|
posted 12-19-1999 04:59 AM
Kurt: Thanks for your answer (gee... two pices of the same crap: and just when you managed to get rid of the first one, and thought you were safe, you got that new one, and as a gift... I'd have liked to see your face! LOL ). Then, this is what I'd like to know: I got IAF, and I liked it (crappy terrain, but I could live with it); it was a bit relaxed, but not to the levels of Novalogic, and it had IMMERSION! I have always wanted to fly in the 1969/73 campaign, and finally had a Mirage to ride on! IAF gave me the impression to fight along the war, from the early stages up to the Libanon, as in a single, long and struggling campaign, while if I understand well, USAF gives you only 6 missions to flight over Vietnam (which, btw, is the only campaign that I was looking for in this game). Now, I got the demo of USAF: great terrain, but I found me struggling hard to keep the plane levelled while it was rolling like a crazy Croc. There was something wrong here! I appreciated the FM in IAF (althought a bit relaxed): you could not turn in a F4 with an F16, and you have to watch for energy on a Mirage, with those big Deltas bleding speed in turns. Some of you were complaining the opposite about USAF: How does FM compares to IAF? What the hell they have done to FM in this sim?
Posts: 273 | From: Italy | Registered: Sep 1999 | IP: Logged
|
|
G.Blast
unregistered
|
posted 12-20-1999 01:18 PM
Lud von pipper: If you like IAF, you´re gonna love USAF, more planes, better graphics, the whole pakage is great, and the price, even better(I payed $50 for IAF).------ Give it a break guys, all of you know this was an ATF upgrade, why did you expect for a F4 or F2 kind of game??? Good hunting.
IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contact Us | COMBATSIM.COM Home
© COMBATSIM.COM, INC. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by Infopop Corporation Ultimate Bulletin Board 6.04b
|
|
Home of the VMF-124 Death's Head Squad
|