Google
Web
This Site


News Feeds











This is our archive forum. It contains posts from 1999 to 2003. If you prefer, you may participate in our current COMBATSIM.COM Forum




  
my profile | register | search | faq | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
»  COMBATSIM.COM ARCHIVE FORUM   » Game Discussions (Title-specific)   » Jane's USAF   » BEST SIM IN DECADE is USAF....

   
Author Topic: BEST SIM IN DECADE is USAF....
mayte
Member
Member # 1091

posted 12-14-1999 02:20 PM     Profile for mayte   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message   Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote
I have MANY- flights,Golf,Racing-this is BEST by far in graphics,fun... My buddy loves the photos I took of Vegas, Grand Canyon,Germany from the air... he still does not know this is from game!!!! Sim of the Decade- easily USAF....
Posts: 30 | From: Toronto,Can. | Registered: Nov 1999  |  IP: Logged
MadHatter
unregistered

posted 12-14-1999 04:02 PM       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote
Best Sim of the Decade???
you're joking right?
It's a nice looking sim...I'll give it that.
But doesn't come close to even making sim of the Week.

IP: Logged
PinchVF-124
Member
Member # 223

posted 12-14-1999 04:30 PM     Profile for PinchVF-124   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message   Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote
That's right MadHatter piss on the guys parade. nice
Posts: 61 | From: Anaheim Ca U.S.A. | Registered: Sep 1999  |  IP: Logged
Douger
Member
Member # 1239

posted 12-14-1999 05:00 PM     Profile for Douger   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message   Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote
Yea,what he said!
Sure is fun as hell for people who have jobs,families,you know,a life so they dont have eternity to figure out how to play a sim only to find out that by the time they figure it out the sim is outdated and rusting in a hangar somewhere.

Posts: 9 | From: Henderson,NV US | Registered: Dec 1999  |  IP: Logged
Swampthing
Member
Member # 388

posted 12-14-1999 05:19 PM     Profile for Swampthing   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message   Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote
I wouldn't give it sim of the decade, but i sure as hell WOULD give it sim of the year. It's by far the funnest and best looking sim on my hard drive.
Posts: 285 | From: | Registered: Sep 1999  |  IP: Logged
MadHatter
unregistered

posted 12-14-1999 05:54 PM       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote
Hey...I said I liked the graphics. lol
You'd give USAF "sim of the year"??
come on...get real
oversensitive joystick control, huge hit bubbles. Three mile gun kills, Phantoms that pull 18g's without falling apart, phantoms out turning F16's...
A-10's accelerate like they have afterburners, and can hold turns as if they were running afterburners.
If these things were fixed...well then I'd be more inclined to play this sim. But I think I wasted my money.
Oh. one more thing I have big problems with in this game is the padlock view. All the flipping forwards and backwards it does. If it would stay in one direction it would be ok.
I bought this game, and I was excited about it at first just like most of us were. I still think it's great looking game. But after playing it for a while I just couldn't handle all the little things that were bugging me. So I shelved it.
So then you're wondering why am I here??
well I keep hoping that there will be a patch that will allow me to enjoy this game.

Oh and by the way I have a family, I have a job...I still found time to learn the ins and outs of Falcon 4, I'm learning the ins and outs of Flanker 2 as well. And I know I'll learn the super hornets too. It's all in your priorities. Take the manuals to work and read them on your coffe breaks, on the bus, or in your car pool. Doesn't take long to apply the knowledge to the game if you have it in your head.

I didn't mean to start a flame war or anything likt that. I just question wether games should be "sims of the decade or year" based on graphics alone. Which is what you guys are doing.

sorry for pissing anyone off...
but it's the truth.
MadHatter out....


IP: Logged
slingshot
unregistered

posted 12-14-1999 05:58 PM       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote
I've taken that your a newbie in flight-sim, huh? Start simming this year while the genre has been alive from the 80's and a decade means you gotta start looking from 1990?

No intention to flame here but your absolutely entitled your opinion. Cheer for free speech (and please no snickering in the back)

PS: does "sim" excludes other type of simulation other than flight-sim? If yes, hummph..hummph (trying to suppress laughter)


IP: Logged
Douger
Member
Member # 1239

posted 12-14-1999 07:47 PM     Profile for Douger   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message   Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote
Personally,graphics dont mean a whole heck of alot to me,and sure it needs some "random features"worked on but then go to a F4 group and list the bugs there(which I've owned since day one,Flanker 2,which I also enjoy.They all have bug list,but very few "survey" sims are not meant to be extensive to the point where each plane deserves 200 pages each.I do not agree that it should be "sim of the year",I still reserve that for Longbow 2.
I know its old but I still think that its still the only one that has come the closest to hitting the mark right out of the box in my opinon.
So all I meant was for the feeling of acomplishment there is F15,F4,LB2,
But for short term amusment USAF seems to do the job at least for me,luckily I hav'nt had any problems running the game.
Lets just keep good feelings here and reserve the bad ones for the bad guys and help each other out.

------------------


Posts: 9 | From: Henderson,NV US | Registered: Dec 1999  |  IP: Logged
Vark111
Member
Member # 1072

posted 12-14-1999 09:19 PM     Profile for Vark111   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message   Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote
Best Sim in Decade... Hmmm. It's a fun game, mind you, but I don't think it deserves quite this billing. It also depends on what you think is "best". Are you talking realistic? Then my vote goes to F4 (though I hear SH will trounce it in AI at least). Or are you talking about just fire it up and have a blast? In that case, my vote goes to an oldie but a goodie: FA (tons of planes, what...some 15 or so different maps, and as many weapons as a lib maker could squeeze into a lib!)

------------------
Cry "HAVOC"! And let slip the dogs of war...


Posts: 294 | From: So. Cal | Registered: Nov 1999  |  IP: Logged
Bigshot
Member
Member # 4

posted 12-15-1999 08:01 PM     Profile for Bigshot   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message   Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote
Well, I enjoy Falcon4. I also had Novalogics F22 Lightning III for several months. I thought Novalogics sim was a hell of a lot better then USAF. Novalogics sim had better graphics and worked all of the time and the flight model in the F22 was better then the spacecraft flight models in USAF. I returned the thing. Maybe after several patches come out, I might consider buying it again; but for now, I'd give Novalogics F22LIII more stars than USAF. And that ain't say much for USAF. It looked like sh+t with my TNTv4400.
Posts: 1291 | From: Suttons Bay, MI, USA | Registered: Sep 1999  |  IP: Logged
Marauder
Member
Member # 700

posted 12-15-1999 10:19 PM     Profile for Marauder   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message   Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote
hmmm decade huh?

drop by Janescombat.net and you will see more people playing WWII, FA (ANCIENT), and F15.

I am personally not impressed by the graphics, like someone said previously Novalogic has had excellent graphics for the longest time. As far as fun, this is relative to you *preferences* and what you are looking for in a sim.


Posts: 160 | From: | Registered: Oct 1999  |  IP: Logged
Viper06
Member
Member # 1443

posted 12-16-1999 02:38 PM     Profile for Viper06   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message   Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote
I'm not saying that USAF is the sim of the decade but to compare it to a sim that only has one aircraft is not right either. Yes it needs a patch but to say it is a poor sim is not correct either. I enjoy the different types of aircraft and different missions for each. BTW I have been flying simns since the first FALCON has been out. I used to play it on a MAC +
Posts: 1 | From: Valrico, FL, USA | Registered: Dec 1999  |  IP: Logged
Kurt Plummer
Member
Member # 358

posted 12-16-1999 07:29 PM     Profile for Kurt Plummer   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message   Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote
If there was going to be a patch...

It would have been out by now.

Pixel has ducked with the money and run for the hills, hoping that we'll be sufficiently 'ooooh and awwh shucksed' by some flaming worthless piece of TBird Trash that we won't notice how LONG this steaming pile of dogpoop has been stinking up the airwaves without any REAL improvement.

I got it (two actually) hated it, waited for it to get better, and now /can't/ wait to hear how much we're going to have to 'pay for a patch' in the addon. 39 bucks isn't chump change for ALL of us you know.

How Typical, JF-18 is a lump of coal in my stocking while Pixel has whambammed-and-
doorslammed.

Did I mention that UME is still a 90% lock-up-solid 'experience' for me? It's a scream.


Bend Over America; /USAF/ has been 'done' by the Israelis. KP


Who couldn't jerk his fly down fast enough, has enough internal vinegar to put out most flames, and thinks that an average of six worthless missions 'per war' is about the dumbest thing since Pointers in the Pool to liven up the Olympic synchronized swimming.

Oh wait, that's actually a good one...


Posts: 672 | From: | Registered: Sep 1999  |  IP: Logged
GeekGuy
unregistered

posted 12-17-1999 01:21 PM       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote
Sim of the decade that's stupid it's not a sim but a flippin arcade game shoot-bang-kill
don't even have to learn how to land a plane not a sim just an arcade game maybe a good arcade game lock up target?
hogs fly faster than migs ?
hit enter that's all and then fire missles
no brainer arcade quickie
Pixel sucks and they are pilots they should know better

IP: Logged
Warspite
Member
Member # 1455

posted 12-17-1999 01:46 PM     Profile for Warspite   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message   Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote
I have to agree with you mayte. USAF is definitely the best combat flight sim of its kind I have ever played.
Posts: 269 | From: | Registered: Dec 1999  |  IP: Logged
Lud von Pipper
Member
Member # 82

posted 12-17-1999 04:51 PM     Profile for Lud von Pipper   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message   Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote
So, how USAF compares to IAF (terrain apart)?

...and Kurt, please, can you reformulate the central part of your message (i can't understand it!) ?


Posts: 273 | From: Italy | Registered: Sep 1999  |  IP: Logged
Bigshot
Member
Member # 4

posted 12-17-1999 05:26 PM     Profile for Bigshot   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message   Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote
For once, I agree with Kurt. The part I could understand anyway. If they're gonna sell a novalogic game then they damn well better adverstise it that way so us consumers know what we're getting ahead of time. I'm really hesitant know after this USAF to buy the new F18 sim. What's that gonna be? Another novalogic arcade shooter upper? Sorry, still pee'd about falcon4 version 1.08 crapola.
Posts: 1291 | From: Suttons Bay, MI, USA | Registered: Sep 1999  |  IP: Logged
PinchVF-124
Member
Member # 223

posted 12-17-1999 07:32 PM     Profile for PinchVF-124   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message   Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote
GeekGuy = Your name says it all. LAMO!

BigShot = "If they're gonna sell a novalogic game then they damn well better adverstise it that way so us consumers know what we're getting ahead of time"

They NEVER advertised it as a "HardCore" sim.
If you were to read Janes site you would see.
Does the box read ULTRA REALISTIC? NO!!

Key Features

Fly the hottest 8 jets in the U.S. Air Force
More than 62 historical and hypothetical missions including a semi-dynamic future campaign Advanced graphics featuring spectacular special effects, 3D cockpits for each aircraft, and screen resolution up to 1280 x 1024 Mission recording and playback
Detailed 'real-world' terrain using stereoscopic satellite data with true elevation and coloring Voice activation for wingman commands, aircraft operations, and pre-defined chat messages JanesCombat.Net compatible - Multiplayer mode supports up to 16 players.

"I thought Novalogics sim was a hell of a lot better then USAF"

Thats because you have that old TNT card. Novalogics F22 graphics would run better on that card. Upgrade to TNT2 and THEN see what you're missing!!

Lame excuse to be mad BigShot. I've read some of your posts , and I think you're a bitter old man that likes to be pissed..

Kurt Plummer = "If there was going to be a patch...It would have been out by now."

Im surprised you posted this 3rd grade statement! LMAO For someone that seems to be an intelligent person , you blew on that one. But me thinks its reverse psychology P


Lud von Pipper = USAF terrain is WAY better then IAF.


Pinch...


Posts: 61 | From: Anaheim Ca U.S.A. | Registered: Sep 1999  |  IP: Logged
Kurt Plummer
Member
Member # 358

posted 12-17-1999 08:17 PM     Profile for Kurt Plummer   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message   Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote
Hey Lud,

I hope you're not pulling my leg, if so, prepare to be bored...:-)

I got two copies of USAF for my birthday, one from the gentler half and one early on my own hook because I wasn't sure she'd be getting it and 'couldn't wait'. I took mine back but kept the gift.

This got me into trouble later because I had posted a message that said something like 'It goes back'. I swear up and down that I played the game through the first evening (which is in and of itself a baaaad sign) so it didn't matter that I got another copy. I sure as hell couldn't take /that one/ back, to the same store.

Still, I dropped the hammer on Pixel for what I felt were some easy technical fixes (weapons, ECM and airspeeds) as well as a general disappointment with the accuracy of the mission modelling that would have needed some rather more substantial changes.

Now one of the threads here mentions a possible addon. I imagined this would be the way things would go when Pixel promised (in an interview) editors and stuff 'based on sales' but made no further response.

Not only have we not had that but the game itself doesn't 'work' in so many _easy_ areas to fix.

Graphically, yeah it's pretty (excepting the F-4 and F-22) if a tad 'watery' at moments.

I still get a lot of hits in the frame rates with smoke and multiple aircraft even occasionally dumping me to desktop (especially around the airfield) but I don't mind the terrain tears etc. so much (the landscape still beats the acid trip that was IAF by leaps and /miles/).

I think this may be part of my biggest disappointment in that, on at least one side, USAF comes /so close/ to being 'superb'.

The User Mission Editor. Not my fault dude. It just doesn't turn on without locking up my machine to the point of reboot.

Janes Lump Of Coal. Well we all know it will be a diamond 'some day' but to miss Christmas with JF-18 seems, unusual.

A USAF _PATCH_ or even an expansion set for one of their other games would have been a decent enough interval hold but still, Santa Jane 'all I wanted for X-Mas'...(was a Bug and a good ship to fling it from:`)

Pointers. Great White Sharks. KP


Posts: 672 | From: | Registered: Sep 1999  |  IP: Logged
Bigshot
Member
Member # 4

posted 12-17-1999 09:22 PM     Profile for Bigshot   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message   Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote
"Bitter old man" you say. Mind your manners. Not bitter, just upset at these programmers who never seem to get it right. I'm running a $3000 system which is less than a year old. Got the TNTv4400 last January. It was the fastest available then. If this hobby requires a complete replacement of hardware every six or eight months, then I'll stay with the sims I already have and forget about buying anything new. You guys wonder why flight sims don't make any money? Well, here's your answer. Who in their right mind is gonna pay thousands of dollars on new hardware for a new $50 dollar game to work right? Those of us that have nearly new equipment certainly won't. Not very many rational people would. These programers had better get their heads out of their arse and listen to the suits who'll fire em' if they don't get it right. Make the sim good and for the broad spectrum of sim enthusiasts with something a bit less than brand new technology. I don't consider my Dell P2 450 old technology. It can be done. Microprose proved that with EAW. Microsoft proved that with Combat Flight Simulator.
Posts: 1291 | From: Suttons Bay, MI, USA | Registered: Sep 1999  |  IP: Logged
GeekBoy
unregistered

posted 12-17-1999 09:44 PM       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote
it sucks nothing but flashy graphics
like spinner bait for fishing
Pixel went fishing and got some fish to bite
dumb fish bit on flashy graphics and easy game
stupid flight models like flying yo-yo beginner game not sim
best arcade maybe but horrible sim
what does it simulate? nothing close to reality
simulates easy flight game for beginners who don't know how to fly

IP: Logged
PinchVF-124
Member
Member # 223

posted 12-17-1999 11:59 PM     Profile for PinchVF-124   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message   Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote

ROTFLMMFAO @ GeekBoy....



Posts: 61 | From: Anaheim Ca U.S.A. | Registered: Sep 1999  |  IP: Logged
MadHatter
Member
Member # 1454

posted 12-18-1999 01:23 AM     Profile for MadHatter   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message   Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote
yeah...geekboy is a funny guy....
always get a chuckle out of his posts
so what kind of bait would you use for Walleye??
lol

Posts: 90 | From: | Registered: Dec 1999  |  IP: Logged
GeekBoy
unregistered

posted 12-18-1999 07:00 AM       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote
"so what kind of bait would you use for Walleye?? "
how bout a nice bridge in baghdad or a pol site in yugoslavia
walleye bait
lgb bait

IP: Logged
Jackal
Member
Member # 1202

posted 12-18-1999 11:23 AM     Profile for Jackal   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message   Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote
Don't understand why you guys are moaning about USAF. Of course such a survey sim can't have the ultimate realism.
More important : This sim can win (and it does !) people for the flight sim genre, who might buy a hardcore sim next. And considering the latest sim cancellations, we'll all benefit from that.
A friend of mine has a little software shop in Germany, he also imports sims from US or UK on request . Here are his sim sales in 99 :
Falcon 4 : 212
USAF : 86 (after 3 weeks of sales)
Mig Alley : 12
DI Superhornet : 2 (after 1 week, one of those was me!)
Luftwaffe Commander : 1 (that was not me)
Flanker 2 : 0

Preorders for Janes F/A 18 (advertised in USAF): 23 !

Get the idea ?
Jackal


Posts: 220 | From: | Registered: Dec 1999  |  IP: Logged
GeekBoy
unregistered

posted 12-18-1999 04:49 PM       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote
don't matter how many they sell it ain't the sim of the decade cause it ain't a sim it's an arcade game
IP: Logged
Vark111
Member
Member # 1072

posted 12-18-1999 05:09 PM     Profile for Vark111   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message   Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote
Geek, Jackal's point was it doesn't matter if it's a sim or an arcade game... It's gonna keep the genre alive. The only people who bought F4 were the people who already knew about flight sims. I've sold 3 people at work on getting into flight sims... That's three people who never flew on a computer before... By letting them try out USAF. They sure as hell didn't want to try out F4, even though it *is* a better piece of software.

------------------
Cry "HAVOC"! And let slip the dogs of war...


Posts: 294 | From: So. Cal | Registered: Nov 1999  |  IP: Logged
Daddio
unregistered

posted 12-18-1999 07:51 PM       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote
Wait let me get in on this. I can REALLY heat it up! Which one of you is saying that ANY GAME on a PC is a simulation???

Without a REAL cockpit that moves, shuts out the outside world, has real switches and gauges, etc... and a screen that is at least on 3 sides of me, then I wouldn't call it a simulation at all. You need about $200K for a SIM. You want real go buy a ride in a P-51 or T-28. This is just a PC. Of course that's my opinion, I could be wrong!

So how big does the manual have to be to make it a sim? What amount of missle tracking accuracy, or deviation of slipstream vs. rudder movement? Hell I dunno!!! I just know that I like it or don't!

I actually enjoy all flight programs (some better than others) and I buy most of them. I've got Falcon4, F2, USAF and IAF (although I did delete IAF!).

So everybody stop debating for a minute and check my post about MFD buttons. I want to program keys for them for my cockpit! Yes I have a TM cockpit with lights and switches, etc... Here's a story. When I was a kid (a looong time ago, I'm 44) I got this thing for XMAS called a Jimmy Jet. It was a little plastic cockpit with little knobs and a round plastic scenery drum that rotated around a light bulb. Had little crosshairs on the buildings in the scene and when one came by I'd press my little button and swooosh! shoot a plastic missle right over the dogs head! Now THAT was fun. My dad first saw my TM cockpit and said "damn kid got a new Jimmy Jet!" That ought to about sum it up...

My kids favorite thing to do in the cockpit? Star Wars Pod Racer. Hey, it's fun.

Have fun with it guys, that's why we are here!

Check Six,
Daddio

P.S. Geekboy, what's up with the "Me big you little fish bait" broken English? Keep it up it makes me laugh...8-)


IP: Logged
Lud von Pipper
Member
Member # 82

posted 12-19-1999 04:59 AM     Profile for Lud von Pipper   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message   Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote
Kurt:
Thanks for your answer (gee... two pices of the same crap: and just when you managed to get rid of the first one, and thought you were safe, you got that new one, and as a gift... I'd have liked to see your face! LOL ).
Then, this is what I'd like to know:
I got IAF, and I liked it (crappy terrain, but I could live with it); it was a bit relaxed, but not to the levels of Novalogic, and it had IMMERSION! I have always wanted to fly in the 1969/73 campaign, and finally had a Mirage to ride on!
IAF gave me the impression to fight along the war, from the early stages up to the Libanon, as in a single, long and struggling campaign, while if I understand well, USAF gives you only 6 missions to flight over Vietnam (which, btw, is the only campaign that I was looking for in this game).
Now, I got the demo of USAF: great terrain, but I found me struggling hard to keep the plane levelled while it was rolling like a crazy Croc.
There was something wrong here!
I appreciated the FM in IAF (althought a bit relaxed): you could not turn in a F4 with an F16, and you have to watch for energy on a Mirage, with those big Deltas bleding speed in turns.
Some of you were complaining the opposite about USAF:
How does FM compares to IAF?
What the hell they have done to FM in this sim?

Posts: 273 | From: Italy | Registered: Sep 1999  |  IP: Logged
G.Blast
unregistered

posted 12-20-1999 01:18 PM       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote
Lud von pipper:
If you like IAF, you´re gonna love USAF, more planes, better graphics, the whole pakage is great, and the price, even better(I payed $50 for IAF).

------

Give it a break guys, all of you know this was an ATF upgrade, why did you expect for a
F4 or F2 kind of game???

Good hunting.


IP: Logged
mayte
Member
Member # 1091

posted 12-20-1999 02:08 PM     Profile for mayte   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message   Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote
bEST SIM YET-USAF- look at discussion!!!!! NO other combat sim has gathered this much attention!!!! More to follow!!!! Stay tuned-I have a GREAT topic for discussion!!!!
Posts: 30 | From: Toronto,Can. | Registered: Nov 1999  |  IP: Logged
80th Glas Eye
Member
Member # 1488

posted 12-21-1999 06:41 PM     Profile for 80th Glas Eye   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message   Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote
USAF Really disapointed me. Not for the reasons here. But for one simple reason. The connections. I buy flight sims for flying online. I wan't a stable game that won't bore me to death, and won't drop connections every 2-3 minutes. I've never enjoyed flying against AI opponents. Way too easy to figure out. I like human opponents. Unpredictable!! Keep you thinking. And I really got sucked in by Janes when they announced to the world about the plans for a "virtual battle field". My thinking was if it would work online for 100 pilots, then it would really be nice for me and 7 or so of my friends. My Squad is lucky if we can connect more than 2 people at a time. We dumped this sim about 1 week after buying it. We fly Falcon 4.0 with the 108i patch and routinely get 6 or more pilots on line with minimal warping and no disconnects.

Janes has a real long way to go to ever get me as a customer.

------------------
Happiness is the growl of a sidewinder!!!


Posts: 1 | From: Oak Harbor, WA | Registered: Dec 1999  |  IP: Logged

All times are MST (US)  

   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
Hop To:

Contact Us | COMBATSIM.COM Home

© COMBATSIM.COM, INC. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by Infopop Corporation
Ultimate Bulletin Board 6.04b



Home of the VMF-124 Death's Head Virtual Marine Squadron
Home of the VMF-124 Death's Head Squad