Google
Web
This Site


News Feeds











This is our archive forum. It contains posts from 1999 to 2003. If you prefer, you may participate in our current COMBATSIM.COM Forum




  
my profile | register | search | faq | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
»  COMBATSIM.COM ARCHIVE FORUM   » Real Military Discussions   » Current   » Why aren't Russians wearing helmets in Chechnya (Page 1)

 
This topic is comprised of pages:  1  2 
 
Author Topic: Why aren't Russians wearing helmets in Chechnya
SPOT
Member
Member # 453

posted 02-27-2000 01:38 AM     Profile for SPOT   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message   Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote
I mean photos don't lie. Most of the combat photos of the Russian soldiers in Grozny and in the countrside manning road blocks show armmy and interior ministry troops wearing black watch caps. I've seen very few wearing helmets. And even fewer wearing ballistic protection in the form of a bullet proof vest. Now the NATO forces in Kosovo are always wearing helmets and kevlar vests. I mean if you got all these Chechan who want to snipe at you wouldn't you wear a helmet? I wonder how many head wouds could have been prevented because most Russian soldiers don't appear to wear a helmet. Is it poor discipline, lack of equipment or both? Anyone?


Posts: 573 | From: | Registered: Oct 1999  |  IP: Logged
Envelope
Member
Member # 275

posted 02-27-2000 01:09 PM     Profile for Envelope   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message   Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote
Thinking of the photographs I've seen at Venik's site, I remember seeing one or two photos of guys in helmets and seeing helmets hanging on the sides of vehicles. It seems as though there are more photos of armor and flight activity than just simple infantry activity. Maybe there is less motivation to wear helmets in the places where the photographs are taken. Photography in war has got to be pretty hazardous. Most of the photographs we see are going to be under circumstances where the photographer feels safe. If you were in a combat zone, where would you feel safest? Where they are wearing helmets or where they are not wearings helmets?
Posts: 2057 | From: Davis, CA, USA | Registered: Sep 1999  |  IP: Logged
Major Tom
Member
Member # 1256

posted 02-27-2000 05:07 PM     Profile for Major Tom   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message   Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote
Helmets and flak jackets dont make all that much of a difference when a high powered rifle round hits you.

For most of the block by block breeching efforts the russians are wearing helmets and flak jackets. They do some good against close range pistol rounds.


Posts: 1352 | From: Prescott, AZ | Registered: Dec 1999  |  IP: Logged
Blond_Knight
Member
Member # 67

posted 02-27-2000 05:09 PM     Profile for Blond_Knight     Send New Private Message   Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote
Remember too that a helmets primary purpose is to deflect shrapnel, not bullets. Of course their are documented cases of just that happening, but my experience was that you could hear better w/o them, and for some reason, you were less likely to be fired on if you were'nt wearing one...go figure.

WOW MajorTom that was close...LOL

[This message has been edited by Blond_Knight (edited 02-27-2000).]


Posts: 1093 | From: Richmond Va - Capital of the Confederacy | Registered: Sep 1999  |  IP: Logged
Johnny
unregistered

posted 02-27-2000 06:32 PM       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote
Blond_Knight,
Maybe it has something to do with looking less important?

IP: Logged
Major Tom
Member
Member # 1256

posted 02-27-2000 09:18 PM     Profile for Major Tom   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message   Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote
Helmets do offer some measure of protection in a breaching situation. No helmet or vest offers any protection against rifle rounds and very very little against a pistol. But then again, maybe I've been thinking too much about the kinds of protection the local SWAT guys use. Those kinds of vests and helmets do STOP pistol rounds.

My friends father had a hood unload an entire 9mm clip, something like 12 bullets into him. He not only survived, he drop kicked the little knucklehead and got him into a headlock. Would have made a great Real TV type video clip, except it took place behind the cruiser.

The look on that stupid hoods face after he ran out of ammunition must have been classic. Right up until this 240lb Texan screamed, "YOU STUPID SON OF A BITCH, I'LL KILL YOU, YAAAAAAAHHHHHH!!!!!" On the tape the little bastard say something like "oh fu..." just before Mike drope kicked him.

The really sad part about this (for the criminal) was that my friends father was wearing the tactical vest on the outside in plain view.

Then again, if criminals where smart, they wouldn't be doing criminal things.


Posts: 1352 | From: Prescott, AZ | Registered: Dec 1999  |  IP: Logged
Envelope
Member
Member # 275

posted 02-27-2000 10:06 PM     Profile for Envelope   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message   Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote
My high regards to your father, Major Tom.

[This message has been edited by Envelope (edited 02-28-2000).]


Posts: 2057 | From: Davis, CA, USA | Registered: Sep 1999  |  IP: Logged
Scout
Member
Member # 657

posted 02-28-2000 05:53 AM     Profile for Scout   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message   Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote
No Major Tom, when they get smart, they go into politics

Cheers,
Scout


Posts: 715 | From: Israel | Registered: Oct 1999  |  IP: Logged
Major Tom
Member
Member # 1256

posted 02-28-2000 09:24 AM     Profile for Major Tom   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message   Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote
Not my father, my buddies father. He recently retired as a matter of fact. Nice guy, wouldn't want to get on his bad side. God saw fit to endow him with a wedge like body and a neck three fold larger than his head

If any of us where smart we'd get into drug smuggling, or politics, which pretty much amounts to the same thing more often than not.

My father is a bean counter. Certified CPA and CFO for US Aggregates Inc. At 56 years of age he is mulling over retirement at this point in his life, but figures he doesn't have anything else better to do with his time. Cant say I blame him.

But man I gotta tell you, those tactical bullet proof vests really do the trick against pistol rounds. Amazing. They far surpass anything the police have had in protection. Heck they even stop those damn "Black Rhino Cop-Piercing Uranium Tipped Death Bullets" (or at least thats what the local gun club nick named em), you know, the ones the liberals have been all up in arms about.

It's nice to know the boys in blue are getting some decent, working protection from the dumbass element of society. Hopefully, some day, good cops wont die because some asshole just doesn't want a traffic ticket. Makes me sick what cops get killed over these days, $20 stick ups, domestic disputes, man that just aint right.

What we need is some kind of rifle defeating vest. Not even 2 months ago a guy in Texas with an SKS called 911 just so he could pick off cops for some minor grudge he had with em. The bastard killed 3 of them. The first policemen to arrive on the scene got half way out of his car before being blown in half. And the other two policemen where found riddled with bullets, still straped into their seatbelts. The last person to buy it, a DPS trooper, he barely had time to warn the other squad cars behind him.

What a waste.


Posts: 1352 | From: Prescott, AZ | Registered: Dec 1999  |  IP: Logged
Scout
Member
Member # 657

posted 02-28-2000 11:40 AM     Profile for Scout   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message   Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote
That's strange... I mean here in Israel pretty much anyone owns or is liable to own some kind of firearm... everybody gets one during the service and you even have to go home with it on leaves and such. Yet I can't recall a single case of such public shooting. I mean there are crimes that envolve firearms, but nothing like psychos going up a water tower, shooting the heck out of everybody he sees. Or like that school thing.

I'm not trying to judge or label anyone here or say that "mine sh|t smells better blah blah blah", just never understood why those "rampages" are more common in US of A than in any other "civilized" countries.

Cheers,
Scout

[This message has been edited by Scout (edited 02-28-2000).]


Posts: 715 | From: Israel | Registered: Oct 1999  |  IP: Logged
Blond_Knight
Member
Member # 67

posted 02-28-2000 03:52 PM     Profile for Blond_Knight     Send New Private Message   Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote
Hmmm It might have something with all your Countrymen having something common..your religion, and your military service. Glad to hear your well armed over there...cause you sure need to be.

[This message has been edited by Blond_Knight (edited 02-28-2000).]


Posts: 1093 | From: Richmond Va - Capital of the Confederacy | Registered: Sep 1999  |  IP: Logged
Major Tom
Member
Member # 1256

posted 02-28-2000 04:26 PM     Profile for Major Tom   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message   Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote
There have been a few cases where your version of our "average, quiet middle aged white male" went completely off his rocker. Your response to people like that has been very lethal. That stuff happens, always has always will, in every culture.
http://www.geocities.com/Area51/Shadowlands/4077/mass.html

Rather distastefull and down right rude site about mass murder, but informative none the less. I actually thought that America had the sickest of the sickies until a friend pointed me to this page last year.
http://www.geocities.com/Area51/Shadowlands/4077/mor.html

Eitan Mor, and Israeli, Killer, Psyco, and towards the last few seconds of his life... Sniper Target Practice

We have two problems in America, one being not everyone is raised around firearms here and people are careless when they get them. The other problem is that not everyone owns a firearm and even if you do, you probably aren't allowed to carry it on your person.

At the risk of stereotyping, it's the cities and suburbs that contain all the triggering factors for gun violence. Their tough anti gun laws make it difficult for honest people to legaly use their guns for self defence. Our movies and television glorify the gun.

When an uptite suburbonite slob or Hood gets his hands on a gun, any gun, they get that "IM GOD" feeling, because they have guns and they can be assured that very few others have them. These city dwelers know only what they have seen on TV about guns. Now an unstable middle aged man with a gun is one bad thing, an unstable teenager with one is even worse.

You remember when you where a little teenager right? Your ideas and beliefs probably changed on a bi-weekly basis. It's only natural to have a bitter hatred of one person one week and the next be the best of buddies. When you introduce a weak mind with no prior knowledge of firearms to guns, they are going to try and apply those weapons to everyday school life. Just like in the movies.

It's a rather sad situation. It did not used be this way with firearms in America. But I can offer some possible solutions to this delema by following the examples set by your country and switzerland.

-Require extensive military style training for firearms ownership
-lift all regulations on guns for those who complete training
-severely punish those that do try and get guns without training

It's a little known fact that most criminals in the US dont have access to automatic machineguns. Most mass shootings and or crimes have been perpetrated by people with ordinary pistols and hunting rifles. I think people would gladly go through training to get an automatic for self defense.

Gun laws, or no Gun laws, you are still going to have crime. With smart gun laws you aren't going to have hardly any gun crime. Look at Israel, they pack so much heat that the muslim wankers had to resort bombing open air markets after a few dozen botched attempted machinegun massacres.


Posts: 1352 | From: Prescott, AZ | Registered: Dec 1999  |  IP: Logged
Envelope
Member
Member # 275

posted 02-28-2000 06:03 PM     Profile for Envelope   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message   Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote
Ditto on the gun policy, Major Tom. This micromanaging gun technology is pointless. Although I am hesitant about the issue of fully automatic weapons.

Corrected, Major Tom: Your buddyies father.


Posts: 2057 | From: Davis, CA, USA | Registered: Sep 1999  |  IP: Logged
Major Tom
Member
Member # 1256

posted 02-28-2000 07:09 PM     Profile for Major Tom   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message   Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote
The thing is, once people learn about guns. They become less interested in machine pistol type weapons, they see their flaws. Low accuracy, low reliability, high cost and larger size if you want accuracy and reliability.

I think most people would rather be running around with holstered or concealed pistols, pump shotguns for home defence, and Assault Rifles tucked away in their garages.

Would I want to stop a man who wants to walk around with an AK, or Mac-10. Well who am I to determine their need for firearms. It will all even out eventually, some people just seem to like automatics and high powered sniper rifles. They are few and far between.

Out of the dozens of gun owners I've known, not one of them ever had any interest in getting a legal FFL automatic, but one did an automatic conversion to his .22 rifle.

To prevent mass shootings and widespread gun use in the underworld you have to make the costs of a aggression so great for the criminal that he'd be safer off picking pockets. Criminals are cowards. They wont fight when push comes to shove. Brandishing a gun will scare away one more often than not.

I'm one that's always believed that the day you start paying taxes, is the day you should have all the rights and privilages in the constitution grated to you. 18 years of age is a fine age for total firearms ownership, once one proves to be of genuine moral character and sound mechanical knowhow when it comes to firearms.


Posts: 1352 | From: Prescott, AZ | Registered: Dec 1999  |  IP: Logged
Toecutter
Member
Member # 436

posted 02-28-2000 10:29 PM     Profile for Toecutter   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message   Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote
All this of course after that short period of natural selection takes place when the stupid, idiotic and pcshychotic and agressively criminal die off--and take some with them...that`s the price-nothing more and nothing less...
Unfortunately our governing body is TERRIFIED of such a concept-for obvious and valid reasons...Can you imagine indenpendent, free thinking, self reliant individual`s reaction to the attempts and actions of the current breed of our polititians?
I NEVER realised that Switzerland had such sensible gun policies. I`m under the impression that in all of europe and the rest of the civilised world as a matter of fact xcept Israel(no offence but you dudes are in combat readiness right?)gun ownership and use is restricted to either law enforcement or privilidged circles...again for obvious reasons...
My next piece will b an SVD...not much into automatics...tho the tripple burst is effective...

Posts: 1724 | From: States | Registered: Sep 1999  |  IP: Logged
Envelope
Member
Member # 275

posted 02-28-2000 11:22 PM     Profile for Envelope   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message   Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote
The first defence against the criminal elemenent is the legal system and it starts there with rational laws. The use of the automatic weapon in civil confrontation in this country started with the Thompson machine gun and the FBI during prohibition. The gangsters decided they wanted those weapons too and because law enforcement was so corrupt during prohibition, they were able to get them. Now, we have the Second Prohibition in the Drug War with the same problem of gangsters, machine guns and corrupt law enforcement. The Drug War has proven so profitable for criminals you might imagine that it was their idea to outlaw drugs in the first place. Maybe they saw the example of prohibition which made people like Joeseph Kennedy rich and influential. We have seen a whole parade of the errosion of rights under the drug war along with those regarding the right to bear arms.

Posts: 2057 | From: Davis, CA, USA | Registered: Sep 1999  |  IP: Logged
Saburo_O
Member
Member # 1956

posted 02-29-2000 03:11 AM     Profile for Saburo_O   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message   Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote
I grew up around guns & still like to do some target shooting when I get the chance (9mm .357. .44s & even .22s are fun) but I lived in Japan for quite a while & it sure is a lot nicer feeling in thier cities than in Chicago. Making things safer is difficult but a very large percentage of guns used in crimes in the Chicago area come from a small number of stores. They know who thier selling to & what the guns are gonna be used for. We need to really go after those people & shut them down. Every life saved is progress toward safer communities. You can't stop all the psychos & criminals anymore than you can stop all the drunk drivers but some common sense laws & implementation of laws would go a long way.
There is a problem with glorifying violence in the US I think, its seen as a solution. Too many kids get lost too, the sense of community in the US seems kinda weak to me. But I think there's also an incrdible fear of & hatred of government here that makes responsible gun owners afraid of any limitations on thier rights; & most (seems to me anyway) hunters & gun lovers live in safer areas(often rural?), so don't see any need for any gun laws really. And a lot of city folk don't see guns except in the headlines.I've seen polls that showed upto 70% of urban dwellars favor "Gun Control", but outside of those areas the rate is much lower. These groups don't understand each other so there isn't really any dialog on the issue just a bunch of screaming.

Well whadaya think?


Posts: 88 | From: Champaign IL | Registered: Jan 2000  |  IP: Logged
Saburo_O
Member
Member # 1956

posted 02-29-2000 03:14 AM     Profile for Saburo_O   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message   Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote
Boy this is way off the topic isn't it? Sorry about that! Just an issue that has me thinking alot.


BTW I figured that most of the photos of Russian troops were in safer areas too, so thats why they wern't wearing helmets.


Posts: 88 | From: Champaign IL | Registered: Jan 2000  |  IP: Logged
Major Tom
Member
Member # 1256

posted 02-29-2000 09:35 AM     Profile for Major Tom   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message   Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote
The thing is that no gangsters in this second revamp of prohabition have automatics. No one but the police have automatics in this country. Everyone thinks we have all these drug dealers running around with automatics doing drivebys. That is simply not true. Most drive bys are with pistols and the dreaded semi auto machinepistols.

44 cops have been killed in the last 10 years by their own automatic weapons. A 3x more likely occurance than with a civilians automatic.

For some reason Hollywood gave us this missconception about these modern day gangsters running around with full auto machinepistols. Interesting enough, most liberals took this hollywood fiction as fact. Then tried to outlaw weapons that weren't even availible to the civilian market.

The only thing that the ban on the sale of automatics to consumers did was to make it harder for legitimate WWII weapons collectors to trade machinepistols and heavy machineguns.

Well, the thing is that if I could get a real assault rifle these days, it would be a M16A2. I'd do just like the swiss, I'd stick it in my garage with ample clips, supplies and bandoleres.

Here is another one...Grenade launchers? Do you think the right to bear arms could be extended to explosive projectiles? Hey scout, do they let you guys take home grenade launchers with your AR's? My swiss friend indicated that current serving military personel can have the dreaded "assault potato gun" attached to their home defence rifle.


Posts: 1352 | From: Prescott, AZ | Registered: Dec 1999  |  IP: Logged
Blond_Knight
Member
Member # 67

posted 02-29-2000 10:51 AM     Profile for Blond_Knight     Send New Private Message   Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote
Major Tom,

Having used the M-16A1 and A2 in a variety of situations, if long range accuracy isnt a real issue, then Id suggest you go with a Kalashnikov instead. Not only are those AK's almost "Jam proof", but those bullets tumble quickly and really dump their energy into the target rather than sail through it.



Posts: 1093 | From: Richmond Va - Capital of the Confederacy | Registered: Sep 1999  |  IP: Logged
Scout
Member
Member # 657

posted 02-29-2000 11:51 AM     Profile for Scout   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message   Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote
Major tom,

Nope we don't get to go home with a LAU launchers... could be cool though j/k

But if you have grenade launcher or telescopic sight attached to your personal AR, you'll surely not disassemble it each week (or almost each week) before you go home. By the way, in US armed forces , what AR is considered "cooler" to have - M16A2 long barrel or the short barrel version?

In IDF almost all combat units are given the short barrel version because of the higher possibility of a close quarter assault over a long range engagement. It is considered the "coolest" to have one with Elbit sight AND grenade launcher

what, no scumbags with Uzi's? This can't be true... I mean all the movies and all hehehe... Seriously though - I'm sure that if you really want to get your hands on MP5 you can do so in states. Illegaly as well.

Cheers,
Scout


Posts: 715 | From: Israel | Registered: Oct 1999  |  IP: Logged
_ALEX_
unregistered

posted 02-29-2000 12:03 PM       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote
When I ponder these shootings, I cannot understand them at all. Of course, I never been in USA, and about the only americans I've met in Reallife (tm) were either international businesspeople or laid-off buggers calling themselves ecologists

The closest I can get to these events is shootings by conscripts in Soviet Army. Now, that's sometimes a VERY gloomy and desperate environment for a teen to be in - there are units where relationships between privates are VERY poor. So, a guy would decide to commit suicide but take some of those who he hates to hell with him. But this is the only way anything similar happens in Russia.

So, what makes all those civilians (not necessarily teens) so sick then?


IP: Logged
Envelope
Member
Member # 275

posted 02-29-2000 12:21 PM     Profile for Envelope   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message   Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote
Major Tom, automatic weapons are not being used in drive-bys any more, but when they were, this is what first fueled the current reaction against assault type rifles. Gang wars have largely cooled down as criminal middle management has matured. But the portrayal of automatic weapons in the hands of criminals is not just fiction. In South and Central America, it is routine. Frequently there is a radical political pretext as well.

You know, part of the reason gangsters gotta have weapons like this is because they think its cool too. Scout, does the Israeli army really foster such attitudes?


Posts: 2057 | From: Davis, CA, USA | Registered: Sep 1999  |  IP: Logged
Scout
Member
Member # 657

posted 02-29-2000 01:21 PM     Profile for Scout   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message   Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote
Envelope,

No, that's opposite of what I'm trying to say here - we in Israel are pretty much indifferent to firearms. People here are not "obsessed" with guns. Surely in army you are taught to treat your AR like it was your girlfriend - but that's the first rule for every infantryman in any of the world armies. IDF doesn't foster such attitudes - everything's gotta be functional. I mean you're not gonna be hanging out with telescopic sight just because its cool. If you have one - you're probably not a paramedic of your squad.

Cheers,
Scout


Posts: 715 | From: Israel | Registered: Oct 1999  |  IP: Logged
Blond_Knight
Member
Member # 67

posted 02-29-2000 01:32 PM     Profile for Blond_Knight     Send New Private Message   Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote
Scout, correct me if Im wrong but I guess the closest thing we in the US can relate to the gun mentality in Israel now was in our frontier days. If you didnt have a weapon then, you and your family were sure to be preyed upon by the first bandits that came by, there were'nt too many gun grabbers back then ( the few that were confined themselves to the cities )
Except you are surrounded by countries that "train" bandits

[This message has been edited by Blond_Knight (edited 02-29-2000).]


Posts: 1093 | From: Richmond Va - Capital of the Confederacy | Registered: Sep 1999  |  IP: Logged
Scout
Member
Member # 657

posted 02-29-2000 02:04 PM     Profile for Scout   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message   Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote
LOL! It's not Wild Wild West here... its pretty safe to walk the streets if you don't go to Gaza strip or West bank.

I don't have gun, nor do I want to have one.
Of all my friends only two have guns - one is a carrier officer and he's obliged to have one (obviously) and the other works part time as security guard. LOL!

Cheers,
Scout


Posts: 715 | From: Israel | Registered: Oct 1999  |  IP: Logged
Major Tom
Member
Member # 1256

posted 02-29-2000 02:05 PM     Profile for Major Tom   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message   Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote
Envelope-

Seriously, the last problem we ever had with gangs having automatic weapons was in the roaring 20's. It's a very common misperseption that the modern day gangs and druglords had AK-47's and Mac-10's by the dozens. They never did and never will. At worst they had semi auto rimtech AK-47 lookalikes and Tec-9 semiauto pistols. These gangs where buying $400 semi automatic pistols in gun stores, just like the rest of us. You can lay down an awful lot of fire with a 18 round 9mm clip. Get 3 guys armed with them into a car and you can do some major damage.

Original legislation against AR's (assault rifles) was fueled because of this misperception about gangs using automatics and the fact that they are an easy target because of the way they look. Assault Rifles are basically semiautomatic rifles that either look like military guns, or have military like features on them. They are not military guns, or even true assault rifles.

As for central america, well they dont have our gun laws They have truckloads of REAL AK-47's.

Scout-

I think the most popular take home weapon of the national guard is the regular non carbine M16A2 with scope and grenade launcher. A few of the brainwashed 18 year old action movie fans fancy the carbine with a scope and launcher. And why would you want to put a grenade launcher and scope on a carbine? It is a close quarters breaching rifle, not a swiss army knife of guns.

Sometimes I get the feeling these national guard types not only treat their AR like their girl. But actually treat it better.

Blond_Knight-

In the US we still have to deal with bandits and those that want to kill us and steal our lively hood. Our country still hasn't settled down yet. Eurosocialism has no place here quite yet. Nor will it ever have a place here. We are diverse. With that diversity comes constant change. We'll quite honestly never have 200 year old buildings.

Hey scout, does it bother you that so many ureputable people wind up using UZI's? Hell, that Neo Nazi muffin that shot up the jewish community center did so with a semiauto UZI.


Posts: 1352 | From: Prescott, AZ | Registered: Dec 1999  |  IP: Logged
Major Tom
Member
Member # 1256

posted 02-29-2000 02:15 PM     Profile for Major Tom   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message   Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote
On a slightly funny side note, the brittish twits at janes accidently listed two prominant gun rights groups as terrorist organisations in their anual terrorist factbook.

The to groups where the "Gun Owners of America" and "Jews for the Preservation of Firearms Ownership"

Neither of which have ever engauged in any terrorist activities.


Posts: 1352 | From: Prescott, AZ | Registered: Dec 1999  |  IP: Logged
Scout
Member
Member # 657

posted 02-29-2000 02:28 PM     Profile for Scout   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message   Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote
Major Tom,

I didn't say having carbine with telescopic sight makes much sense... (it does sometimes, though) but Elbit sight is not telescopic. It's a simple electronic gadget that you put on top of the handle bars. Once you bring the rifle to shoulder - you see a small red dot where the point of impact should be. It's not laser, so no batteries and all that sh|t is involved. Pretty nice if you ask me and VERY useful in close quarters breaching.

Hey, I don't mind - we got a whole bunch of terrorists whacked by guys with Uzis here. Will Russian soldier feel bad if he knew he was killed with AK-47 in Chechniya and not M-16?

Cheers,
Scout


Posts: 715 | From: Israel | Registered: Oct 1999  |  IP: Logged
Hoverstorm
Member
Member # 1191

posted 02-29-2000 06:09 PM     Profile for Hoverstorm     Send New Private Message   Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote
Scout-

While serving in UNIFIL South Lebanon '96 I remember, passing through Metulla Gate, seeing the female soldiers with Uzi's and the men with Colt Commandos (or something like that). Is this on purpose or was it just a fluke? Another funny thing was while visiting Underground, a club in Jerusalem as I recall, a couple of Israeli guys and girls in uniform walked in wearing their uniforms and weapons and began dancing in front of the DJ. I suppose the weapon must be carried at all times whatever you do.

Hoverstorm.


Posts: 185 | From: Trondheim, Norway | Registered: Nov 1999  |  IP: Logged
Major Tom
Member
Member # 1256

posted 02-29-2000 07:20 PM     Profile for Major Tom   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message   Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote
Wild, never seen one of them. Is there any place I could find more information on that type of sight? Does it display the red beam on the target, or onto some kind of HUD?
Posts: 1352 | From: Prescott, AZ | Registered: Dec 1999  |  IP: Logged
Toecutter
Member
Member # 436

posted 02-29-2000 10:25 PM     Profile for Toecutter   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message   Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote
I think Scout is talkin` about a Bushnell Holo Sight type of an arrangement...quick target accusition...great for urban type engagement...
Posts: 1724 | From: States | Registered: Sep 1999  |  IP: Logged
Scout
Member
Member # 657

posted 03-01-2000 10:33 AM     Profile for Scout   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message   Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote
Hoverstorm,

What's Colt Commandos? Maybe it was Galil? (an AK-47 derivative)
I was in Underground couple of times before all sorts of thrash started to come there...
Those guys and gals with weapons...seems strange to me.. when I was active duty I did go to some clubs on uniform when on leave but we always left our weapons in some corner of the club with one of our guys watching. How was your experience with Hizbullah? Do you think it's fair that they fire on us from inside their villages so we cannot strike back?

Major Tom,
Yeah, it's like mini-hud, only it's round. Let me dig the web a little and find a picture for you.

Cheers,
Scout


Posts: 715 | From: Israel | Registered: Oct 1999  |  IP: Logged
Hoverstorm
Member
Member # 1191

posted 03-01-2000 12:16 PM     Profile for Hoverstorm     Send New Private Message   Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote
Scout,

No I don't think it's fair. As far as I can remember the weapon I saw looked something like this:

Hoverstorm.


Posts: 185 | From: Trondheim, Norway | Registered: Nov 1999  |  IP: Logged
Scout
Member
Member # 657

posted 03-01-2000 03:45 PM     Profile for Scout   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message   Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote
Hoverstorm, Yep that's M16A2 Carbine Major Tom was talking about. Uzi has been retired in the IAF as far as combat AR goes. So girls and REMFs (Rear-echelon mother fu*kers ) that usually don't have duties that may involve combat are sometimes given this Uzi thing.

I hate it because its old and heavy design and it's REALLY not a safe weapon to handle. There's a joke in the IDF - Q: "Which method is the most efficient to clear a room full of terrorist?"
A: "You just throw Uzi inside". Hardyharhar

That's pretty much the way it is. The newer models like Mini-Uzi are pretty sleek though.

Cheers,
Scout


Posts: 715 | From: Israel | Registered: Oct 1999  |  IP: Logged
boshar
Member
Member # 2166

posted 03-01-2000 05:12 PM     Profile for boshar   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message   Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote
Hey I was a REMF in the KLu (Royal Netherlands Air Force) don't be so negative on the UZI.

At least it not heavy (compared to FALs our grunts had to use) it is easy to carry indoors or when you get into a vehicle. It makes a lot of noise when you pull the trigger (to improve morale) and when you remember to aim in the general direction of the enemy he might be impressed by the fireworks.

Just remember to put the safetey on and don't drop it or you might get hurt. One thing i never figured out though. The long distance setting on the visor (500 meters? I don't remeber exactly). Is there anyone alive that can hit something with an Uzi that far away (throwing the Uzi itself doesn't count).

It actually did make an impression on me to carry a weapon. (gun laws here prevent the wide availability of firearms) I was amazed how simple the thing was. One question. Do your girls and REMFs oil the weapon or is that a European thing (rain & rust). It was always a real chore to keep the sand out of an Uzi.

Happy memories... been there, did that, thank God I'm doing something else now.

Harry


Posts: 94 | From: Rotterdam, the Netherlands | Registered: Jan 2000  |  IP: Logged
Major Tom
Member
Member # 1256

posted 03-01-2000 06:09 PM     Profile for Major Tom   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message   Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote
The M16A2 Carbine is really a nice close quarters battle gun. The bullets tumble, causing massive damage to any person it hits. When the .223 bullet hits kevlar or the like it actually turns the "bullet proof" vest inside out as it penetrates.

Uzi's are...well, replaceable. From what a person who frequents the middle east has told me, most of the Egyptian MP's pack vintage surplus UZI's.

I'm sure the FN-FAL makes a nice club.


Posts: 1352 | From: Prescott, AZ | Registered: Dec 1999  |  IP: Logged
Scout
Member
Member # 657

posted 03-02-2000 05:47 AM     Profile for Scout   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message   Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote
quote:
Hey I was a REMF in the KLu (Royal Netherlands Air Force) don't be so negative on the UZI.

Hehehe, I was a REMF too. Sorry if I gave out a different impression. I haven't had to carry Uzi - I had an M16A2, M16A2 Carbine and Galil Carbine during my 3 year service.

quote:
Do your girls and REMFs oil the weapon or is that a European thing (rain & rust).

Sure you are required to oil and clean it, however this is not something REMFs usually do

quote:
Happy memories... been there, did that, thank God I'm doing something else now.

Ditto here. I'm still a reservist though - they can call me whenever they feel like it. It's pretty annoying I must add.

Cheers,
Scout


Posts: 715 | From: Israel | Registered: Oct 1999  |  IP: Logged
Skater
Member
Member # 3257

posted 03-02-2000 03:02 PM     Profile for Skater   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message   Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote
The sight you are talking about is a simple Mil-Dot sight.

Elbit's is typically a ruby or amber optical frame with a high contrast red dot in the center. You sight the weapon in with this dot.

It makes for very quick targeting as you can achive a good sight picture virtually instantaneously.

Mil-Dot sights are made by many manufacturers. Generally they are very simple and very light weight, have no zoom or optical enhancement qualities.

Basically, you put the weapon to your shoulder, look through the sight glass, and place the red dot on what you want to shoot. There are no emissions from the sight as with a laser. They are non-reflective (ruby or amber treatments on the sight glass) and completely passive.

-Skater


Posts: 78 | From: NYC | Registered: Feb 2000  |  IP: Logged
Major Tom
Member
Member # 1256

posted 03-02-2000 04:36 PM     Profile for Major Tom   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message   Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote
Ok, I've seen this type. It's also called a red dot scope.
Posts: 1352 | From: Prescott, AZ | Registered: Dec 1999  |  IP: Logged

All times are MST (US)
This topic is comprised of pages:  1  2 
 

   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
Hop To:

Contact Us | COMBATSIM.COM Home

© COMBATSIM.COM, INC. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by Infopop Corporation
Ultimate Bulletin Board 6.04b



Home of the VMF-124 Death's Head Virtual Marine Squadron
Home of the VMF-124 Death's Head Squad